TheHistoryForum.com History discussion board.
[ Active ]
[ Register ][ Login ]
Promote
TheHistoryForum.com
Register in moments. Login to remove many advertisements and join discussions!
Promote This Topic:

The Mongol Invasion of Japan

18% Historic
Historical musings: 376
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2004, 23:06
Post Sat 26 Nov 2005, 12:27
Rome's Caesar was successful in conquering Rome. Why was Mongol's Kubilai Khan unsuccessful in conquering Japan? Both situations were pretty much similar. A rapidly rising empire conquering its neighbors. Yet, while Caesar succeeded Khan failed. The question is, did he really?

The official historical records and evaluations conclude that the typhoons at the time of invasion sank all the invaders. It's like natural disasters had to do something with men's will to military conquest. Is it really possible? It's like Columbus could not have discovered America if there were strong hurricanes in the Caribbeans.

It's very unbelievable that the mighty Mongol invading forces could not conquer Japan because of typhoons. If they failed at first really because of typhoons, why couldn't they come the next year or the next? The distance between the invasion base of Koryo dynasty of Korea and Japan is somewhat similar to the distance between England and France. They couldn't land on Japan because of some storms? That's really hard to believe.

But, it's also convincing that some powerful typhoons could have indeed deterred the invading forces. And when it really happened, the Mongols thought that they just could let go of Japan, for they really were basically land armies. But, the Han Chinese and the Koreans at the time very much aided and helped to organize the Mongol navy and its gigantic attack ships. The Chinese and the Koreans were well experienced and had the know-how of building effective navies, no doubt about that. The Yellow Sea was abundunt with naval warfare and commercial activities between the two and Japan. And to suggest that the typhoons ended Mongols dream of conquering Japan is really I would say a very unconvincing case.

But, still, no historical records and books have been found or written that conclude that Mongols had conquered Japan and included it as their territory. It's just very easy to question this historical conclusion.
18% Historic
Historical musings: 376
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2004, 23:06
Post Sat 26 Nov 2005, 12:34
The typhoon season in the region is similar to the Atlan hurricane season: during the summer months. So if the Mongols failed at first, they could have come during early spring or late fall or something. They had the local knowledge from the Chinese and the Koreans, they really could have conquered Japan easily.
User avatar
11% Historic
Historical musings: 232
Joined: Thu 03 Feb 2005, 05:13
Post Sat 26 Nov 2005, 13:23
Quote:
Rome's Caesar was successful in conquering Rome.

HiFo is always going to be 3rd rate innit?
Image

"...with their jeeps, chewing-gum, dollars and vulgar assumption that Old France will become just like them."
18% Historic
Historical musings: 376
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2004, 23:06
Post Sat 26 Nov 2005, 13:52
That's Britian. I do not read what I just write.
18% Historic
Historical musings: 376
Joined: Sat 25 Dec 2004, 23:06
Post Sat 26 Nov 2005, 14:00
Log-in to remove this advertisement.
Caesar conquered Britian. Yes, ok.
And I just might add here that maybe typhoons indeed deterred the Mongol forces. Both Napoleon and Hitler got kicked out from Moscow with the help from the cold. So, it is convincing that typhoons played the same. But, the question is, typhoons do not last months. They last maybe a day or two. I lived in the region, so I know typhoons. Typhoons are same as hurricanes, big powerful storms. They would cross the seas and land on the mainlands and will disappear. Comparing the feeezing weather and typhoons are not really convincing.

And the Mongols probably knew that they local knolwedge of the typhoon season. The Mongol invading forces of Japan was largely made of the Mongols themselves and the local Chinese and Korean forces. They were well aware of the typhoons. But, still, one can still make a case that Napoleon probably knew about the freezing situation near Moscow. And still he chose to invade there during winter months. Same can be said of the Mongol situation.

But again, as I said, typhoons do not last long time. If, the Mongol ships were all destroyed by the typhoons, then perhaps, they could not make more ships back home and start invasion again. That probably is the only convincing reasoning behind why Mongols failed to conquere Japan.

However, with the large war chest of the Mongols, why there were no follow up attack is also another question. Overall, the general conclusion that the typhoons as the winds of god really is awful.
User avatar
Historic
Historical musings: 2881
Joined: Wed 25 Aug 2004, 00:08
Post Sun 27 Nov 2005, 02:12
Quote:
Rome's Caesar was successful in conquering Rome. Why was Mongol's Kubilai Khan unsuccessful in conquering Japan? Both situations were pretty much similar.

Actually the two situations are not similar.
1. Rome was big on imperialism. The Mongols were still basically at heart raiders and often ignored concrete political power in an area in favour of advancing further and making the locals do the work.
2. Japan is further away IIRC. The oceans might be a bit meaner there too.
3. Opposition: The Japanese were better organised and equipped to repel the invasions than the assorted British tribes. Especially since the Japanese had a taste of Mongol tactics with the first raid and could adapt.
4. IIRC the Romans were able to recruit locals to help out their effort, the Mongols couldn't or didn't.

Quote:
It's like natural disasters had to do something with men's will to military conquest. Is it really possible?

The effect was multiplied by the Mongol practice of retreating to their ships (again, a result of the raider mentality). Hence bad weather didn't just destroy transport, it destroyed the Mongols as a raiding force.

Quote:
It's like Columbus could not have discovered America if there were strong hurricanes in the Caribbeans.

Well if the storms sank his boat then, yeah.

Quote:
It's very unbelievable that the mighty Mongol invading forces could not conquer Japan because of typhoons.

They couldn't conquer Western Europe because 'some guy' died. Sure he was Ghengis Khan... but then, sure, we are talking about a typhoon here.

Quote:
If they failed at first really because of typhoons, why couldn't they come the next year or the next? The distance between the invasion base of Koryo dynasty of Korea and Japan is somewhat similar to the distance between England and France. They couldn't land on Japan because of some storms?

Maybe it was viewed as too hard a task with little benefit. Further, who was supposed to give the order to invade? The Mongols at the best of times were not all that centralised, it was physically difficult.

Quote:
But, still, no historical records and books have been found or written that conclude that Mongols had conquered Japan and included it as their territory. It's just very easy to question this historical conclusion.

How about the absense of Mongols in Japan today? Or Japanese artisans or what have you being shipped to Korea etc.?

Quote:
Both Napoleon and Hitler got kicked out from Moscow with the help from the cold.

Here in lays a problem with your thinking. Napoleon and Hitler, like the Mongols, were not just defeated by weather. In fact, the opposing military force had a lot to do with their defeat or retreat. Japanese forces beat the Mongols in battle, they retreated, their boats were wiped out.

Quote:
But again, as I said, typhoons do not last long time. If, the Mongol ships were all destroyed by the typhoons, then perhaps, they could not make more ships back home and start invasion again. That probably is the only convincing reasoning behind why Mongols failed to conquere Japan.

How do you know the Mongols even knew their fleet was destroyed? If everybody in the force died, the Mongol command might have assumed the Japanese annihilated it and hence were too hard a nut to crack (one possibility).
MB.
[+-]
User avatar
Battleship-Meister
Historical musings: 985
Joined: Sun 09 Mar 2003, 02:09
Post Sun 27 Nov 2005, 19:35
IIRC, in the fighting between Japanese and Mongol forces that did occure, the Mongol were quite superior to the Japanese in both tactics and equipment.

So, unless the Typhoon sunk the invasion fleet, the Mongol probably would have won.
Image
User avatar
Historic
Historical musings: 2881
Joined: Wed 25 Aug 2004, 00:08
Post Sun 27 Nov 2005, 20:28
Quote:
IIRC, in the fighting between Japanese and Mongol forces that did occure, the Mongol were quite superior to the Japanese in both tactics and equipment.

I was under the impression that on the second outing the Mongols were more evenly matched.

Also weren't Mongol tactics based on mobility? If so their choice to withdraw to the ships after battle negated their advantage. Strategic mobility would have been hampered by Japan being an island chain with mountains.

Edit: For those of you who want to learn more about the basics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_invasion_of_Japan
User avatar
27% Historic
Historical musings: 542
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 20:41
Post Wed 30 Nov 2005, 06:05
As far as I am concerned, the loss was due to the fact that the Mongol cavalry, which had been the success of pervious conquests, did not fare so well aboard ships.
MB.
[+-]
User avatar
Battleship-Meister
Historical musings: 985
Joined: Sun 09 Mar 2003, 02:09
Post Thu 01 Dec 2005, 17:35
Quote:
that the Mongol cavalry, which had been the success of pervious conquests, did not fare so


Heh.


But, don't forget, Mongol tactics and commanders were also pretty much superior to everything their contemporary oppenenats could muster.

I remeber one historian saying, "the Mongols are best imagined as a modern army transplanted into the 12th century". If the Mongols could have gotten ashore, things would have been very different.
Image
User avatar
27% Historic
Historical musings: 542
Joined: Fri 25 Jun 2004, 20:41
Post Fri 02 Dec 2005, 06:18
Quote:
If the Mongols could have gotten ashore, things would have been very different.


No doubt about that.
User avatar
1% Historic
Historical musings: 32
Joined: Tue 31 May 2011, 13:16
Post Tue 31 May 2011, 14:44
The kamikaze really was more of the nail in the coffin, so to speak, of the Mongol Invasions. In other words, they were well on their way to defeat before the kamikaze hit. The Japanese defenders were more than holding their own against the Mongol invaders.

Contrary to what's been said in this thread, the Mongols DID get on shore.

This is a great PDF on the subject, that's since been made into a book.

http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/pdfs/conlan.pdf
MB.
[+-]
User avatar
Battleship-Meister
Historical musings: 985
Joined: Sun 09 Mar 2003, 02:09
Post Wed 01 Jun 2011, 00:33
Regarding the invasion of Japan, I have never studied this subject in detail.
[+-]
I'm new (say hi & be nice to me!)
Historical musings: 5
Joined: Wed 27 Jun 2012, 04:13
Post Wed 27 Jun 2012, 21:17
Hachiman Taro wrote:
The kamikaze really was more of the nail in the coffin, so to speak, of the Mongol Invasions. In other words, they were well on their way to defeat before the kamikaze hit. The Japanese defenders were more than holding their own against the Mongol invaders.

Contrary to what's been said in this thread, the Mongols DID get on shore.

This is a great PDF on the subject, that's since been made into a book.

http://www.deremilitari.org/resources/pdfs/conlan.pdf



Yes, indeed, the Mongols did land onshore but faced one of many walls that the Japanese had built in preparation for a Mongol invasion after the first attempt. The truth is that winter would have arrived and the Mongols would have still been on their ships, running out of supplies and feeling demoralized.

Japanese swimmers were harassing the Mongols ships at night. They would start fires, kill anyone they could and dive back in the water. Since most Mongols and Chinese couldn't swim they would escape.

Furthermore, many of the ships that sunk in the typhoon were river vessels, which Kublai Khan used because he didn't have the patience to build enough sea vessels.
[+-]
I'm new (say hi & be nice to me!)
Historical musings: 1
Joined: Sun 03 Feb 2013, 23:02
Post Mon 04 Feb 2013, 19:00
Log-in to remove this advertisement.
thing is to compare the Invasion of Japan by the Mongols to the British Invasion by Ceaser. While the Mongols surpassed the japanese in Tactics. The Japanese were a lot more organized then the celts. The celts fought a lot amongst themselves there was no real collusion between them. The Thing about Typhoons is the Typhoon season far outlives the atlantic hurricane season by almost double the time.
Log-in to post your comments and remove Infolinks advertisements.
More Historical Forums: The U.S.S.R. Forum. Political Forums: The Politics Forum, The UK Politics Forum.
© 2004- Siberian Fox network. Privacy.